post comment

Manny Pacquiao

If skill beats size why doesn’t Mayweather fight Sergio Martinez Boxtramoron ? Or better yet Wlad Klitschko ?

Posted December 6, 2012 10:31 pm 


As a matter of FACT hey LOOK!!!! LOOK!!!! at the “Austin Trout shows his mettle in the Garden…” article where I broke down the difference in Floyd’s Defensive SKILL level and Trouts. The analysis was SO spot ON that it made Hissydalgo RUN like a SISSY.

Posted December 5, 2012 3:43 pm 


By the way Trout’s SKILLS and Boxing IQ combined are GREATER than Cotto’s. And that’s why he WON. But Trout’s SKILLS and Boxing IQ are LESSER than Floyd’s.

Posted December 5, 2012 3:36 pm 


There goes Haterdalgo again, always Hating but never NOT ONCE Congratulating. Why?? Because he Hates MY GREATNESS….Haterdalgo doesn’t know WHAT I DO or what I DON’T know nor does he know what I HAVE or have NOT done. Also his reading SKILLS are terribly POOR. Not only have I broken down one Fight I’ve broken dow n PLENTY including the one where he was touting Ortiz and I predicted that Ortiz would be in trouble at the end of 4 and I was CORRECT…..Haterdalgo hates ME SO MUCH that he just made two posts about ME but with NO Boxing points. IF you want to write about ME then go to We talk about Boxing HERE. Hating ME is your personal matter that has nothing to DO with Boxing. Go SEE Dr. Phil about that.

Posted December 5, 2012 3:34 pm 


There goes Braggadamus again, always using the word “skills” but he has never–NOT ONCE–technically described how one fighter beat another or how one could beat another. Why? Because Braggadamus doesn’t really know anything about boxing. He’s never boxed in his life. Never had a boxer’s workout, never trained for a boxing match. Never trained or coached a boxer, and doesn’t personally know one single professional boxer. Or amateur for that matter. Not one. Yet he claims he’s “the greatest.” Braggadamus couldn’t analyze a fight if his life depended on it. However, he does like to blow himself.

Posted December 4, 2012 11:41 pm 

Manny Pacquiao

Twit …..

Posted December 4, 2012 10:54 pm 


Trout is good! and he through that jab enough to give Cotto problems he also showed his power of pushing Cotto off him. It was good fight Cotto really didn’t do enough and in the later rounds he almost go knocked out. I love his Rhythm though, Cotto is fine fighter.
Look forward to seeing Trout again.

Posted December 4, 2012 6:00 pm 


Trout is ok but cotto lost the fight . cotto seemed a lot slower than when he fought Floyd . maybe because trout moved around a lot unlike Floyd.if he overtrained that’s one thing but if not that he shoud retire. he cannot beat the top fighters in that class and might actually get another paceman type beat down which will force him to retire.

Posted December 4, 2012 4:47 pm 


Webster-THANKS for skipping over the TRUTH but the TRUTH remains whether you skip over it or not. The TRUTH is that your statement was FALSE. Chavez Jr. had the weight, size, and age advantage and LOST. SKILLS is the most important factor in Boxing. IF you don’t remember anything else remember THAT.

Posted December 4, 2012 3:26 pm 


THANKS for skipping over the TRUTH but the TRUTH remains whether you skip over it or not. The TRUTH is that your statement was FALSE. Chavez Jr. had the weight, size, and age advantage and LOST. SKILLS is the most important factor in Boxing. IF you don’t remember anything else remember THAT.

Posted December 4, 2012 3:18 pm 


Joe – Thanks for the reply, you are right, time will reveal all. I finally got around to listening to this weekends wrap, another fine show. Ronnie, as always, offers excellent insight as well. Trout may deserve the Canello bout based on the win, but he has yet to earn it based on his draw. I hate to say it, but I think that even now, Cotto vs Canello, while not as challenging a fight, is a more exciting “event”. Yes, its Zahir all over again, but you can’t argue with PPV numbers. Plus now I am starting to get amped for some of the other potential match ups you guys were discussing for Trout. No need to throw these two young guns into the ring together right now; if they are the last two men standing at 154 the fight will make itself (I hope).

Posted December 4, 2012 10:22 am 


Looks like I was wrong! Alvarez is going to take the fight. wow, Hope it’s true 2013 maybe getting started just right.

Posted December 4, 2012 12:12 am 

Manny Pacquiao

Like Floyd Mayweather Tark ? Trout beat Cotto easier than Floyd did . Lets see Floyd fight Trout. ;)

Floyd avoids skilled boxers with a jab like the plague. It’s hard to counterpunch against a good boxer with an a grade jab, that’s why Floyd hasn’t fought any :)

Posted December 3, 2012 11:25 pm 

Joseph Herron

Thanks for the kind words, Webster.

You could be right on your assessment of both Cotto and Trout…but you could also be wrong. Only time can tell us this. Before the Mayweather bout, everyone thought Cotto was washed up and Money was going to kill him.

We found out otherwise. What are my three favorite words on the show?

Judge slowly, brother!!

Thanks for reading and listening, Webster!!

Posted December 3, 2012 5:02 pm 


“But lets face it, he had a weight advantage, a size advantage,and an age advantage.”-SO WHAT??? Maybe you’re new to Boxing but those advantages are not the MAIN advantage. The MAIN advantage in Boxing is the SKILLS advantage and that’s why Trout WON. His Defensive and Offensive SKILLS were BETTER than Cotto’s….Chavez Jr. had the weight, size, and age advantages vs. Martinez and still LOST because the SKILLS advantage TRUMPS those advantages. IF Cotto had more SKILLS than Trout he would have WON.

Posted December 3, 2012 4:55 pm 


Joe – You are always a good read and a blast to listen too. However, let’s not get too excited about the results of this fight. As soon as they flashed the tale of the tape it was pretty clear that we had a blown up welter weight who best days were long gone against what is essentially a solid middleweight in his prime. The thing I give Trout real props for is not wilting in the spotlight. But lets face it, he had a weight advantage, a size advantage,and an age advantage. Plus he has the good fortune of not having been brutally beaten to a pulp. Cotto’s face started to mark up during the ring walk. Miguel is a balls to the walls fighter and I give him much respect, but his team really should have had him cash out his chips in a PPV against Canello.

Posted December 3, 2012 4:36 pm 


I think canelo stands a chance against trout might even favor him but doesn’t mean a thing if isn’t willing to step up & fight him.As is the case he just walked off after another huge potential fight went out the window ,ortiz being the first one.Maybe he should stop showing up to fights & jinxing em.Kinda like that fake prophet who always jinxing fights lol.

Posted December 3, 2012 4:00 pm 


Canelo is EASIER to hit. Trout WINS on points.

Posted December 3, 2012 3:30 pm 


“Do you think Floyd should “look for” Sergio?”-Yup. I’ve SAID it time and time again. Its one of the few Fights where Floyd has something to GAIN. Floyd is the BETTER Boxer and would WIN the Fight.

Posted December 3, 2012 3:29 pm 


It wasnt….

Posted December 3, 2012 1:55 pm 


Hidalgo it was just that Cotto hit him it was the positions he caught him in. Cotto was able to snap Trouts head repeatedly because he would catch Trout blindsighted or flatfooted or both. Guys like Canelo and GGG dont have the timing and skill level that Cotto has but if they catch Trout in similar fashion he wont survive.

Posted December 3, 2012 1:54 pm 

MNboxingFAN – Sean

Cotto had some great fights recently above 150lbs … that’s after most people said he should retire too! So I don’t blame him for fighting there, but his fights were against guys moving up themselves from lower weight classes and guys who should be retired in some cases (Mayorga). I can’t say he’s overmatched at 154lbs though when someone like Floyd Mayweather Jr. says that Cotto was his toughest fight and they fought at 151lbs. So what’s three pounds? Yes Trout is naturally bigger and stronger, but I think Cotto could’ve beaten him and should’ve beaten him. Cotto fought a stupid fight. Plain and simple. That and Trout fought a smart fight. Give credit where it’s due. Cotto isn’t finished, but I don’t see him as a Champ again. Time will tell.

Posted December 3, 2012 1:23 pm 

It’s Me, Ernie

Yup, and the best around…

Posted December 3, 2012 1:21 pm 


@54, Alvarez is elite…

Posted December 3, 2012 1:20 pm 

Mick the Marmalizer

REALTALK: Of course Trout’s not an elite fighter & nor is Alvarez. However if they fought each other then the winner would be on the right road for elitism & this is why unification is the only way forward.

Posted December 3, 2012 1:15 pm 

E in Denver

Might be time for Cotto to hand them up. Cotto’s resume speaks for itself. The guy has fought everyone & gave career beatings to several top fighters as well as taking some brutal beatings himself. Trout vs. Canelo is now the most logical match up. Hopefully it happens in the next year

Posted December 3, 2012 1:00 pm 

The Mad Scientist

Cotto is overmatched at 154 by the top guys plain and let’s get on with the million dollar beatdown so we can put that charade behind us already and move on to some more meaningful fights for Canelo.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:57 pm 


I had picked Cotto by stoppage via round 7 but boy did Trout surprise me. Cotto’s long past his best and he looked like he couldn’t pull the trigger.

All credit to Trout however…the guy can fight and showed he can mix it up when he has to. That said I don’t agree that Austin Trout is the best kept secret in boxing…not even close.

Trout is a very solid boxer no doubt and one that be a problem for anyone who fights him. However I see Trout losing to the top guys in his division as well as those just above and below his weight class. Had Cotto been busier in this fight Trout may have been stopped. Cotto caught him a number of times with some very good shots, he just wasn’t throwing more than one or two at a time.

I hope Trout vs Canelo is made. That will be an interesting fight and show us but both men are really capable of.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:56 pm 


After golovkin?……..maybe.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:55 pm 

Publicv Enemy

I think that the best money fight now for Cotto would be a Cotto vs Canelo Mex vs PR matchup.. and it the younger Canelo beats Cotto so be it.. Cotto has just not been the same Old Cotto and especially once he got the Cuban Trainer who I believe has been all wrong for Cotto, nothing against the Cuban Trainer but his stong area is Boxing Skills.. he doesn’t have that Pro Style that made Cotto a top guy.. Cotto should bring back his Uncle and setup a Canelo fight…

Posted December 3, 2012 12:38 pm 

te tumbo

even a cursory review of Cotto’s 154lb ring-resume revealed that he lacked confidence at that weight. being bullied by a bigger and natural middle was inevitable. however, Cotto’s stature will continue to place him in Canelo’s bracket. not interested in watching Mayweather spoil the fun at 154lbs (Again) but i’m sure that “Money” will decide that situation. ultimately, i want to watch Alvarez face them all but why should he do all the heavy-lifting? accordingly, “Dear Santa”, while Canelo is disposing of Trout (Mayweather? Cotto?), Lara should rematch Molina; Vanes should face Thurman; and Kirkland should rematch Angulo. unfortunately, i suspect that too many fight-fans on the “naughty” list will preclude this Christmas miracle.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:23 pm 


I gained tons of respect for Trout…for a guy who came off (last time I saw him fight) as a defense first fighter, truly showed his superb offense against one of the best (Cotto) at 154. I thought he CLEARLY won the fight.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:15 pm 


Boxtradamus – I agree. But Trout is looking to get a win over a “star”, which beating Canelo would be just that.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:13 pm 


Trout did a great job! Alvarez, Mayweather probably not going to happen any time soon. K-9 good next step!

Posted December 3, 2012 12:09 pm 


Indeed. One of the things I liked about Trout was that he didn’t come across like your traditional brain-dead boxer. He made witty comments during his interview, responded clearly and eloquently. I like him.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:05 pm 


they call me ten forty real easy

Posted December 3, 2012 12:04 pm 


Canelo should man up, grow a pair, stop cherry picking and fight Trout next. Trout is the champion so there’s no need for Canelo as some believe should fight Cotto. While the fight on paper looks good, the right thing to do is fight Trout. Trout is a champion and so is Canelo so it only makes perfect sense. If he beats Trout, then call out Cotto, but not before.
On another note, Trout performed really well, not outstanding or exceptional, just very very good. It did the job and the better man won that night. In other words, nothing to write home about. I think Pacman and hands of cement did a better job tagging Cotto than did Trout. While every fighter is beatable, Trout’s tenure as champion will not be long lived unfortunately.

Posted December 3, 2012 11:53 am 


I hope everyone is not hyped about this win? Trout for and I could be wrong is still not a elite figther! He had Cotto in front of him and did not hurt him at all! I think Caneol will kill him and I laugh at how hyped people because Trout beat a blown up WW! Come on HE was way to big for Cotto! Now the Redhead monster is just as big as him and hits 4 times as hard as Cotto!

Posted December 3, 2012 11:41 am 


Herron….. Trout fight the winner of Golovkin-Rosado??? Like that’s going to be Rosado right? Rosado is a great guy but he hasn’t fought anyone since Angulo stopped him in 2—yet he says Golovkin has no defense and he’s certain to score a massive KO because he’s bigger and taller. Gabe has to be the most delusional man in Boxing.

Trout fighting Golovkin would obviously be a stupid move that could turn his career south. AT has to hold out for the Canelo matchup and turn up the heat for the fight. He deserves the fight … and boxing writers need to support his bid.

Arrogant fighters who duck the best matchups need to be called out — early and often.

Posted December 3, 2012 11:33 am 


“Proofread!” LOL, Joseph! I didn’t even see that. OMG, you made a mistake. Flog yourself now.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:47 am 


“Trouts defense simply isnt that good he got hit with shots from Cotto” REM, everybody gets hit by Cotto. Everybody. Let’s remember, Miguel Cotto is an outstanding boxer who has sublime skills. If he hit Trout it wasn’t because of Trout’s poor defense, it was because of Cotto’s vast skill. Cotto may not have beat Mayweather, but he smashed Floyd’s nose. That’s a damn hard thing to do to Floyd Mayweather Jr.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:45 am 


How about a rematch?

Posted December 3, 2012 10:35 am 


I give Cotto credit he picked a good fighter without reservation. Can any other champion of fighter quir cherry picking and fight the best as it is suppose to be. Promoters our at fault protecting their cash cow fighting easy fights.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:33 am 


A Canelo win over Cotto will do as much for Alvarez as Trout’s win over Cotto did for him. Alvarez fighting Cotto makes sense to me and I don’t think GBP needs to, or will, make any excuses to make the Alvarez/Cotto fight happen. Besides, now that Cotto didn’t win the title, he will likely be more than will to fight Alvarez as he has no title to lose.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:17 am 


he is actually a natural heavyweight who doesn’t eat for 90 days prior to each fight.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:17 am 


Since when does Miguel have to be a role model? Or any athlete for that matter? Cotto was disgusted in his loss to Mayweather and disgusted in his loss to Trout. Why? Going into the fights he was confident he would beat both men. But he didn’t. Sure, we expect star athletes to be role models because they get so much exposure and are so well known, but the people who are the real role models for their children are their parents–not some demi-god on the screen, or in the ring. Miguel walked over, gave Austin a hug, a pat, and a congratulations–very professional, very sincere. He had nothing to say to the media so he left the arena. Besides, why would Miguel want to answer questions like “Why do you think you lost? You’ve lost to Pacquiao, Mayweather, and now Trout. Will you consider retiring? What are your plans after this fight?” Miguel was smart to walk away silent. He’s never been a complainer, and he never will be. What he did after the fight will be forgotten long before what he did in the fight.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:13 am 


I asked you before to prove that you chose Trout over Cotto. Please quote the thread of the article you posted your prediction in and paste exactly what you said. Prove it.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:03 am 


“Trout should be looking for Mayweather or Martinez NOT Canelo” Oh really, Braggadamus? Do you think Floyd should “look for” Sergio? If not, why? If so, why? The whole boxing world knows Sergio wants to fight Mayweather so you can’t claim he doesn’t. But I don’t recall you EVER ernestly pushing for a Mayweather/Martinez fight.

Posted December 3, 2012 10:02 am 

Killing Moon The Soothsayer

Correct me if i’m wrong, but is this american boxer actually making sense and being likeable ?….What a breath of fresh air ; )

Posted December 3, 2012 9:31 am 


Trout got 250 Amateur fights. Fighting Trout is trouble for everybody in boxing including Floyd who had more troubles with Cotto than Trout did IMO.

Posted December 3, 2012 7:57 am 

Mick the Marmalizer

Annon: Who are you? Trout would have to put on 14LB! He got a good living to earn @ 154 & I’m sure he’d travell to make it. Rabchenko or Rose in Europe or the UK & more options in the USA & Canada, so why would he eat pies & drink beer to make 168?

Posted December 3, 2012 7:47 am 


Does anyone think there’s a chance of Trout going up to 168 and smashing up Ward?

Posted December 3, 2012 7:25 am 

Swedish Boxing Fan

Well I thod Migel Cotto would suprisengly win the fight, but then again Cotto was never favoued to win by the experts but Cotto is a good fighter with expearence and that was the factor I belived would make him win. Still he fought well against the younger champion

Posted December 3, 2012 7:23 am 

Mick the Marmalizer

I like the fact that Trout don’t care where he fights & would surely take on Canelo in Mexico if required. Alvarez has been sounding off that he wants legendary status & be the #1 in the World @ 154Lb, but to achieve that he’s gotta fight the best & right now the best fight out there is Trout. (I’m not sure if PBF is in the equation @ light-middleweight or if he’s fighting @ 147). if Canelo/Trout doesn’t come off it would be a travesty, but not the end of the World. Trout could always take a trip to Europe & take on EBU champion Rabchenko the ca$h would be good.

Posted December 3, 2012 5:36 am 


rem your delusional pal cotto was “well” beat over the distance he had nO answer to what trout dished out to him no answers to handle trout whats so ever cotto hardly landed any punches of substance at all PERIOD …get a grip man your idol lost and and couldnt handle the fact that is was that obvious to all (except for the one eyed cotto fans) that cotto was out skilled all night LONG pal ………….nO doubt …….

Posted December 3, 2012 4:49 am 

Fight Aficionado

Trout looked great on Saturday but I’m not sure what he’ll bring down the line. Yes he’s slick, yes he fought with heart, but you have to observe a boxer in multiple fights to see their true nature. Anyone else see that snorebore cautious performance in his last bout vs Rodriguez? Or was last night everyone’s first look at Trout? The win over Cotto either a career resurrection or one great night followed by him reverting to form. We can’t be sure just yet.

Posted December 3, 2012 4:01 am 


I dont blame Cotto for storming out of the ring after the fight the whole Garden stormed out of the building after watching Cotto land the much better shots for the majority of the fight and then hear the scorecards there was no one left to listen to a Cotto interview. He personally showed Trout some love before he left and rightfully so Trout is a class act. And who is Cotto smh a man who was lineal champ at jww and then ww a man who was so good Margarito laced his fist with bricks to even up the odds a man who beat a still prime Mosley when his fans thought he wasn’t ready and the man who gave the great Foyd Mayweather a possible goat the toughest fight of his career. In this era Cotto is a A level fighter and please name 1jmw Cotto is the same size as. Cotto vs Hatton lmao thanks bro i needed that laugh.

Posted December 3, 2012 2:57 am 


You must be NEW to the Sport. Cotto was on Top of his Division until Floyd knocked him off. Please keep UP with the Sport of Boxing.

Posted December 3, 2012 2:16 am 


Now, Trout, whom I respect just beat a shop worn Cotto. It was not the size. Cotto is a legitimate 154. But he is not at the top of that division. Cotto has never been at the top of his division. If you want a good fight with Cotto in it with someone on his level, let’s have Cotto and Hatton fight each other in a fight that should have taken place 5 years ago. I don’t Trout has any chance against Canelo. Even though Trout is more skilled, it is not a gimme that he’d beat Kirkland, Angulo, or Thurman.

Posted December 3, 2012 1:16 am 

The Mad Scientist

Hecdog -yes, I believe GBP is planning to move ahead with the Cotto/Canelo fight..if so I hope they do it as soon as possible and not wait till May..give Miguel his well deserved million dollar ass beating so he can finally retire and Canelo can get down to some serious fights that will define his career..

Posted December 3, 2012 1:07 am 


Trout should be rated HIGHER than Canelo now. SO it should be Canelo who is looking for a shot. Trout is the 2nd BEST CHAMP at 154 behind Mayweather….Trout should be looking for Mayweather or Martinez NOT Canelo. You’re already ahead of Canelo. SO might as well see how HIGH you can go. Forget Canelo he’s LOWER than you.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:39 am 


Trout was a GOOD pick just as I predicted!!! I am the GREATEST Fight Prophet ever born!!!!!

Posted December 3, 2012 12:31 am 

The El Paso Fight Prophet

Mayweather vs Trout Makes sense.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:10 am 


Right…. Cotto refused to take his loss like a man or say anything positive about Trout in the short interview he granted.. He left the ring quckly with a sour look on his face. You don’t win them all buddy, so buck up.

Posted December 3, 2012 12:08 am 

Cotto is a whiner

I have to eat my words. I said No Clout Trout was a bum. My apologies NO DOUBT. Turns out Cotto is more of a bum than I thought. Everybody says Cotto is a role model. Oh really? Is that how you want your sons to grow up and be a sore loser, crybaby? Bad sportmanship by a self absorbed man who speaks of himself in 3rd person.

Posted December 2, 2012 11:39 pm 


Great article. Thanks

Posted December 2, 2012 10:16 pm 


Tark, u talking of the same angulo who got slaughtered by kirkland?? if it is im sorry to tell u taht u are completly nuts homie, Canelo smash him like a bug in 3 rounds, BTW i dont like canelo at all

Posted December 2, 2012 9:53 pm 


REM…. If 100 people score a fight they’re not all going to have the same score. It is not your score that counts but the score of the judges, who are supposed to have expertise. If the judges come up with a score that is fairly close to the consensus of writers and fans it’s received well by the public—and that’s what happened in this fight. Trout being a bigger 154 pounds is not an issue. They both chose to fight at 154. Cotto having more wear and tear from ring wars is not a factor. He’s not the only 32-year-old fighter with around 40 fights … Not every fight is going to be your peak career best fight ever. You can keep fighting as Cotto wants to do, or you can retire if you think you’re slipping. MC has 3 legitimate losses and he was going for another world title. He’s an ATG so Canelo’s people can’t say Trout never beat anyone and there’s no reason to fight him … although they’ll probably say that anyway or come up with another excuse to avoid Trout.

Posted December 2, 2012 9:41 pm 


you guys need to lookout for domonique dolton at 154 he only a prospect but he a talented fighter herron im sure one day you be doing a article on him once he get his name out there

Posted December 2, 2012 9:32 pm 

The Mad Scientist

I like Canelo and I’m rooting for the kid to possibly be the next great fighter to come out of Mexico but if he fights Cotto next Im really gonna start losing need for that fight, bring on Austin Trout, the winner of the Vanes/Lara rematch, Martinez and Floyd Mayweather if he still wants it..anything less than that would be a disappointment now that Cotto is clearly out of the picture..

Posted December 2, 2012 9:11 pm 


Canelo has a lot to worry about… He was there at the fight, but didn’t stick around to answer questions about Trout or confront Trout. I’d be amazed if he did the right thing and fought Trout. Everyone at Goldenboy was hoping for a Cotto win, and will still look for an excuse to fight Cotto. They would also love to get a Mayweather fight.

Or why wouldn’t they fight Lara, Angulo, Kirkland, Bundrage, or some other opponent? They’ll ask that famous old question that dodgers ask—who did Trout ever beat?

Posted December 2, 2012 8:54 pm 


Tark in a fight like this with a significant size difference its expected that the bigger mans punch will do more damage punch for punch that doesnt necessarily mean that hes landing the cleaner punches. Its no secret that at this point in his career Cottos face swells easily the score difference in this fight was 115-113 and no bigger.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:51 pm 


The 10-point must system doesn’t give a true measurement of punches landed and damage done. If you outscore your opponent 21 to 13 and land the harder cleaner shots you take a round by one point. After the fight Trout was unmarked. He looked like a white collar worker on lunch break. Cotto was well beaten up because he absorbed far more punishment.

The 119-109 score was inattentive I’d say. Trout wasn’t that dominant. But Steve Farhood, Brian Kenny, and the 2 judges who scored the fight 117-111 all hit the mark.

I was a little surprised by the judging because it often seems like they’re watching a different fight or they’re all 3 watching different fights. This time they did a good job.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:29 pm 


Trouts defense simply isnt that good he got hit with shots from Cotto he didnt see and even though Canelo isnt as crafty and skilled as Cotto hes good enough to penetrate Trouts defense also. If Canelo catches him blindsighted like that Trout can find himself in serious trouble.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:27 pm 


Yeah and also seems to be a very good guy. After the fight Al Hayman’s chubby dude with the white beard seemed to keep telling him act all arrogant. Just let him be himself.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:24 pm 


Canelo is natural 180 pound fighter.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:13 pm 

The Mad Scientist

Bring on Trout vs Canelo!

Posted December 2, 2012 8:11 pm 

The Mad Scientist

When Cotto vs Canelo was being talked about I never thought Miguel stood much of a chance for obvious me crazy but after watching last nights fight I can’t help to think that Floyd Mayweather might be more faded than what we are led to believe..having said that don’t really care to watch Canelo vs Mayweather fight.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:10 pm 


Cotto didn’t win but it was definitely a close fight. Trout is good and I think he gives many folks problems at 154. Heck he gives anybody problems at 154.

Posted December 2, 2012 8:00 pm 

The Mad Scientist

Hecdog I agree with your post and I want to see Trout/Canelo for the exact same reasons you mention..if the fight can be made I see Alvarez winning the fight by late round stoppage or UD if Kid Cinnamon is who I think he is, the real deal.

Posted December 2, 2012 7:56 pm 

Joseph Herron

I’m glad you had a good time, REM…that’s what it’s al about!!

Posted December 2, 2012 7:50 pm 


Joseph lol yeah but he gave me many moments to cheer. 1 things for sure i was very pleased with his performance he was very cagey and crafty against the big young champ.

Posted December 2, 2012 7:34 pm 

Joseph Herron

geez…i sonder who you were cheering for last night, REM…lol

Posted December 2, 2012 7:13 pm 


Cotto is a warrior and would be offended by all the boneheads on here making excuses for him. He lost a close fight and that’s that. You can’t fix stupid, but have a look at the consensus of sports writers ringside scorecards and the punch stats, since your own eyes and powers of reasoning seem to be failing you.

Posted December 2, 2012 7:12 pm 


what impress me by trout is his conditions he wasn tired at all he was still fresh in the last round he was poise didn panic when cotto attack

Posted December 2, 2012 7:10 pm 


p.s. Trout must have outweighted cotto by at least 15 pounds and still didnt win it

Posted December 2, 2012 7:09 pm 


im not going to reply to any replys but cotto won that fight and this article is utter BS

Posted December 2, 2012 7:08 pm 


Lol Joseph i was at the fight last night pretty close to the ring and Cotto had us going crazy consistently knocking sweat off of Trouts head into the crowd. Trout had good moments but didnt land eye popping punches like that. Then this morning i watched it on tv had Cotto winning rd 1 due to ring generalship and well timed punches snapping Trouts head. Trout landed 1 powershot and some straight bodyshots but Cotto looked better. Rd 2 to Trout he outworked Cotto. Rd 3 to Cotto it was close but again Cottos well timed shots got him the round but it couldve went either way. Rds 4,5 and 6 Cotto put on a clinic stopping Trout in his tracks with perfectly timed shots blasting Trouts sweat into the crowd Trout workrate didnt overcome that. Rd 7 more of the same only Cottos slowing down and Trouts size difference and workrate starts coming into play. 8,9 and 10 Trout now starts putting on his own clinic just overwhelming Cotto no question. Rd 11 Cotto musters up all he has left and hits Trout with a couple more welltimed headsnappers that imo outscored Trouts workrate. Round 12 all Trout Cottos running on empty and the younger bigger man has much more left. It should be taken into consideration that the swelling on Cottos face was the result of facing a bigger stronger man but Cotto landed far more telling punches.

Posted December 2, 2012 7:03 pm 


Closer than those idiot judges had it, it wasn’t dominant but Trout did more than Cotto to win. Trout was definitely the bigger man but was surprise that he doesn’t have that much power. I feel Cotto took him lightly and well,he lost.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:57 pm 


Anyone who actually thinks Cotto won should get their eyes checked. The dude had his moments and it was a close fight (8-4, 7-5 if you’re really generous to Cotto), but he’s clearly on the decline. Might as well cash out vs. Canelo next if they can actually sell it to the public, though it would make Canelo look weak for ducking Trout.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:50 pm 


Happy for Trout, he deserved the decision, though I didn’t think it was as wide as the judges did. Canelo will avoid him, which is too bad. Best thing for Trout is to stay busy against the best comp he can get matched with. He’s got Haymon on his side, so that should help. Realistically, wouldn’t mind seeing him matched up next with Bundrage (doesn’t he still have some kind of belt?). Maybe if Trout and Bundrage unify their titles on HBO or Showtime they might get traction toward a mega-matchup with Canelo (who’s all about reward over risk these days and is carefully matched).

Posted December 2, 2012 6:48 pm 

Joseph Herron

Leon and REM, you guys are smoking some serious crack!!

Posted December 2, 2012 6:31 pm 

Joseph Herron

You sure about that, Deven? Floyd has never really been a runner. What makes you think Floyd has lost a step?

Posted December 2, 2012 6:29 pm 


Imo Cottos performance against Trout was way better than against Floyd. Through the first 7 rds Cotto landed tons off well timed powershots upstairs and against Floyd mostly just well timed hard jabs with a handful of right crosses and 1or 2 left hooks. Ima have to walk this road alone but the best i can give Trout was a draw last night.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:24 pm 

Leon B. Little

Nicholas, put the crack pipe down. Powder punching trout poses zero threat to Floyd. The fool can’t punch to save his ass, plus Mayweather is too good and fast for him. How is a joker w 14 ko’s going to give Mayweather a challenge?

Posted December 2, 2012 6:18 pm 


Joseph, so Floyd let cotto beat on him by design. how dum. Floyd does not move like he use to if you h
ave not noticed by his recent fights.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:14 pm 

Leon B. Little

Trout is not that great beating wahed up Cotto. Salmon boy gets ko’d by ggg, Martinez, pac man, Marquez, and Canelli. Even hatton beats him

Posted December 2, 2012 6:13 pm 


If they put the Canelo/cotto fight together, cotto will be destroyed unfortunately. I hope for cottos sake they do not.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:10 pm 


I like Austin, and I hope he does unify the jr. middleweight division title.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:09 pm 


This is a good win for trout, more fans will recognise his name and hes got options of moving up in weight if he cant immediately get the fights he wants. Unfortunately cotto wasnt undefeated hed already lost three times before trout, and will likely lose one more time vs alvarez before he retires. But still a positive breakthrough

Posted December 2, 2012 6:09 pm 

Joseph Herron

Deven, really? He did better against Floyd because PBF let him, huh?

Posted December 2, 2012 6:04 pm 


Come on guy. trout is not that good. cotto has beaten beater fighters than trout in his prime. he is just not the same fighter which is why trout won. cotto is so slow and cannot throw punches when needed. he did better against Floyd because Floyd did not run around.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:03 pm 


Ouch people wanna c Floyd vs Trout who is bigger and stronger than Cotto. Cotto is bigger, stronger and hits harder than Floyd and he blasted Trout with lead hooks all night yet didn’t leave a mark. Not fair to Floyd and im no Floyd fan. The way Cotto was able to hit Trout with well timed lead hooks Trout might struggle with other top fighters at 154 he wont be able to absorb those shots so well from an Alvarez and definitely not from GGG.

Posted December 2, 2012 6:00 pm 


Cotto was always a small jr middleweight which is why some fans/critics were shocked when he chose a much BIGGER guy in trout. Especially in the last stage of his career. Trouts not just tall but hes really broad, i remember thinking ‘holy cow’ when comparing him with cotto at the weigh in. And trouts extremely good at fighting tall and utilising a bigger man advantages, i was pretty darn surprised when cotto took this fight. Theres ‘no doubt’ that trout is a good fighter and hes got props now that he has that big name on his resume. He’ll make a comfortable middleweight so why bother sticking around at jr if everyone keeps avoiding him?

Posted December 2, 2012 5:57 pm 


Floyd is not a 154lb fighter. Notice the only 2 fighters he fought at that weight class both had moved up to that weight class. Floyd is a 147lb fighter

Posted December 2, 2012 5:36 pm 

JOseph Herron

I’m referring to a fight with Triple G!!

Posted December 2, 2012 5:13 pm 

Joseph Herron

Hard fight, but huge payday for Austin on HBO!!

Posted December 2, 2012 5:10 pm 

Joserph Herron

Very good post, Bart!! I scored the fight the exact same way.

Posted December 2, 2012 5:08 pm 


if canelo still fight cotto after he lost i lose some respecr for canelo i mean cotto is pretty much done what the point of canelo fighting him now besides of being a money fight trout deserve his shot he earn it canelo should fight trout two young fighters in there prime to unifie for the belts

Posted December 2, 2012 5:07 pm 

Joseph Herron

What makes me even more upset is a fighter like K9 Bundrage who really isn’t a big ticket seller outside of Detroit, yet he’s also holding the division hostage and turning down everyone within the top 15. He should step up and unify the division with Austin Trout…the winner fights the winner of Canelo vs. Floyd Jr.

Posted December 2, 2012 5:06 pm 


yeah trout got a chance against gennady golovkin cause of his skills and slickness but gennady aint no cotto tho i mean he bigger then cotto punch much harder and much stronger but it be a great fight to watch tho a boxer vs a puncher fight

Posted December 2, 2012 5:03 pm 


I meant “Left”. Southpaws can be confusing.

Posted December 2, 2012 5:03 pm 


i really hope that cotto retires canelo will make a mess of cotto would be horrible to watch his family crying at ring side not to mention that austin trout career reminds me of bhops fought mainly in obscurity going in to other fighters backyards and battling against good boxers for average money and little fanfare
trout and the fans deserve to see canelo fight a legit 154 fighter (even if its just once) so fingers crossed trout canelo happens ..nO doubt …

Posted December 2, 2012 5:02 pm 


the numbers cotto canelo will do would be huge even more so if cotto had got the nod last night
this is whats so wrong with boxing cotto has always been to small and lacking offensively to be a real threat at 154 when he won the title from yuri foremen i wasnt impressed at all as yuri was the weak link at 154 and cotto failed to enforce himself in that fight

Posted December 2, 2012 5:02 pm 


Underestimated his speed and his very busy jab. There is “no doubt” in Trout now. If he could get more power out of his right, he would be a nice package of a fighter.

Posted December 2, 2012 4:53 pm 

Joseph Herron

I think your right about that, Hookoffthejab. I talked Austin about that this morning and he said he got the same vibe from Richard Schaeffer also.

He thinks Golden Boy is still going to try and put together the Cotto/Canelo fight on May 4th as planned.

Bummer…they’re going to give him the Zahir Raheem treatment.

Posted December 2, 2012 4:49 pm 

Joseph Herron

Thanks for pointing it outm Gwite…but don’t be such an elitist about it. I have spell check but not boxing check. It’s one of the only one on one interviews with Austin on the net…post fight. Check it out and don’t be such a jerk!

Posted December 2, 2012 4:41 pm 


canelo will run from trout …nO doubt ……

Posted December 2, 2012 4:39 pm 

Joseph Herron

Thanks, Marc…I think Austin will give every top fighter a very tough time in the ring. He’s only one more big fight away from being recognized as a top pound for pound fighter. I can see him being the only other fighter at 154 with the guts to step in the ring with the winner of Triple G and Gabe Rosado.

Call me crazy, but I think he has the tools to pull off the victory over Gennady Golovkin. Would love to see it…it would also be a very big payday for Austin on HBO in 2013.

Posted December 2, 2012 4:38 pm 


Great piece as usual, Joseph. Very good read.

Posted December 2, 2012 4:23 pm 

Ronald Reagan

Trout is a very good fighter.

Posted December 2, 2012 4:23 pm 

Leave a comment on

Austin “No Doubt” Trout: The best kept secret in boxing is revealed

Back To Top

Close this window.