Judge Stephen Blea Statement about Valdez vs. Conceicao

My name is Stephen Blea, and this is an open letter that I have decided to write regarding my scoring from last Friday night in the Valdez vs. Conceicao fight in Tucson, Arizona, on 10 Sept. 21.

I have been involved in boxing as a ring official both in amateur and professional fields for more than 30 years. I have officiated over 60 championship title fights as a judge & referee in several countries of the world, including Japan, Thailand, Korea, China, Russia, Mexico, and the USA. I have Judged over 200 fights and Refereed over 500 Pro fights, with no controversy.

I have watched the fight and thoroughly analyzed it; the 117-110 score is not accurate. It does not represent the actions in the ring, and I feel I have let down my federation, the NABF, my organization, The WBC, and most importantly, our sport and the fighters inside the ring.

I would like to share my thoughts publicly on the specific conclusions I have reached important topics regarding judging in boxing:

Close rounds – There were a few very close rounds in this fight, and I made two mistakes, 1) not to score 10-10 in 2 rounds I felt there was not a clear winner, 2) scoring those to the champion giving him the benefit in the close actions.

Óscar Valdez, Robson Conceição - Press Room

Crowd noise influence – It was a loud crowd in favor of Valdez; during the first rounds of the fight, some actions took place in a corner in which I had limited view and couldn’t see some punches land by Conceicao. There was no crowd reaction, contrary to when Valdez landed. I was also dealing with photographers and cameramen all cramped up due to the location of the Champion Valdez in the red corner to the left of me. (I was between the photographer’s on the left of me and camera crew to the right, who at times bumped me and blocked and even stepped on my hands while going across the ring apron towards the Champs corner ) Considering these distractions, I honestly thought I would be able to do my Job 100%, no excuses.

Getting Stuck on one fighter – I awarded 3 out of the first 4 rounds to Valdez, which is a combination of the above points I have outlined.

I have scored the bout on tv and have a 115-112 or even a 114-113 score in favor of Valdez.

I have decided to reach out to my NABF / WBC ring officials committee to undergo a thorough training and review program. I will not accept any championship assignments until I complete this process.

I am an honorable man with profound love, knowledge, and respect for the sport; I am sorry for having a bad night and having brought unnecessary controversy to such a sensational fight.

Stephen Blea

3 thoughts on “Judge Stephen Blea Statement about Valdez vs. Conceicao”

  1. Valdez clearly lost this fight. I really can’t understand what these judges were watching. Valdez missed many punches and lost the first 5 rounds easy. I had the unknown Robson C. winning the fight 9 rounds to 3. It’s a shame what the WBC has turned into. From franchise belts and allowing lies like one fighter claiming to be undisputed when clearly he isn’t. This boxing today is trash.

    • Money rules. I wonder how WBC executives must treats this fight:
      – What this f***ing Brazilian thinks he is to get to Arizona and kick our hermano’s ass?
      – Yeah… Whatta kind of profit would we made if our Mexican loses a fight like that?

Comments are closed.